Testseek.se har samlat 348 tester av AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 och det genomsnittliga betyget är 88%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
April 2017
(88%)
348 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Publicerad: 2017-05-03, Författare: Andrew , testad av: techteamgb.co.uk
Sammanfattning: Stock speeds for CPU + 2933MHz @1.4V DRAM @15-15-15-36Overclocked to 4GHz @ 1.425V (1.1V SOC) + 2933MHz @1.4V DRAM @15-15-15-36Can the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X defeat the Intel i5 7600K? I think so. This budget 6 core CPU is a real game changer for those low bud...
Publicerad: 2017-04-13, Författare: Jim , testad av: techadvisor.co.uk
Although a little more expensive than the i5-7600K, it's easy to see that the Ryzen 5 1600X is better value for demanding tasks such as 3D- and video rendering, video editing and compressing and decompressing files. The Intel chip still has an advantage f...
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X isn't a just an affordable chip for gamers and media creators, it an incredible package that puts multi-core computing on the mainstream map...
Publicerad: 2017-04-12, Författare: Luke , testad av: kitguru.net
Superb multi-threaded computational performance that obliterates the Core i5-7600K, Multi-threaded performance makes the i7-7700K and i7-6800K look like poor value for money, Plenty of spare computational capacity for game streamers, Power consumption num
Gaming performance is not as strong as Intel's competition, which is disappointing for this market segment, Kaby Lake competition has significantly better single-threaded performance, Maximum frequency achievable is limited, especially compared to Intel's
With Ryzen 5, AMD builds upon the foundations set by the flagship 8C16T Ryzen 7 processors, and that's generally a good thing.Performance in multi-threaded workloads is in a different league to Intel's price-comparable competitor processors. Ryzen 5 happi...
As unsurprising as the results are given we're just dealing with a similar CPU to the Ryzen 7 trio, just with fewer cores and threads, they are still significant regarding what the Ryzen 5 1600X means in terms of shaking up the mid-range CPU market. Here...
Publicerad: 2017-04-11, Författare: Peter , testad av: eteknix.com
Best price vs performance Ryzen chip to date, 6-Core w/ 12 Threads, AM4 Platform and features, XFR overclocking, Easy to manually overclock, Beats out many more expensive Intel products, Great for gaming/streaming,
None, Neutral, Memory latency is still a little high but it has improved since Ryzen launched, “If you’re eager to invest in Ryzen but don’t need the more expensive 8-Core R7 chips, then the 1600X is the best that R5 has to offer. It’s perfectly suited to
PricingAt just $249/£200, the AMD Ryzen R5 1600X is one of the most disruptive hardware releases in recent years. Not only does it offer more cores and threads than similarly priced Intel solutions, it manages to give some of Intel's much more expensive s...
Publicerad: 2017-04-11, Författare: Paul , testad av: tomshardware.co.uk
Strength in heavily threaded workloads, Superior pricetoperformance ratio for budget workstations, Unlocked ratio multiplier
High price relative to Core i57600K, Lower overclocking headroom
The Ryzen 5 1600X provides a tremendous price-to-performance ratio for budget workstations that rivals Intel's Broadwell-E offerings. Ryzen 5 also provides playable performance in most games, but it lags the Intel competition and doesn't have as much...
Yes. Whether you're encoding video, streaming and recording while gaming, or compressing and uncompressing large files, you'll see a benefit from the extra cores and higher power draw on the Ryzen 5 1600X. Add that to a precisely targeted price point, and...
Sammanfattning: The first half of 2017 is proving to be an interesting one for AMD. There's promise of next-generation RX Vega graphics coming to a PC in May or June, bringing much-needed competition to the high-end space, and AMD already has a trio of Ryzen eight-core C...
Sammanfattning: I'm going to start this article off with a simple number: five. Not only is that the number of months it has taken AMD to effectively turn the x86 processor world on its ear, but that's also the number of distinct model families that they've introduced...
