Testseek.se har samlat 224 tester av AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus och det genomsnittliga betyget är 67%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(67%)
224 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
-
0 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
670100224
Testarna gillade
Kompatibel med vissa Socket AM3moderkort
Förhållandevis god prestanda i tungt flertrådade program
Testarna gillade inte
Undermålig prestanda i förhållande till priset
Hög strömförbrukning
Extremt hög strömförbrukning vid överklockning
Får i vissa fall slåss mot Intels instegsprodukter
Sammanfattning: AMD's Bulldozer processor architecture has been in the works for many years and has been delayed many times, causing all sorts of speculations. The "Zambezi" FX processor is one part of the Scorpius platform which combines the "world's first consumer...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2011-10-14, Författare: James , testad av: futurelooks.com
I am honestly not sure what to make of the FX-8150. I did not really lose or gain any performance in games. While this is disheartening, such is not the case with Sandra 2011. In every benchmark I ran in Sandra, with the exception of the SHA-256 results,...
Incredible Multi Threaded Performance, Excellent Price/Performance Ratio, Smooth Working Turbo Core For Speed Boost, Dual Turbo Modes For Increased Boost In Lightly Threaded Apps, Maintains Excellent Temps At Stock Speeds, Black Edition With Unlocked Multiplier, Eight Physical Cores, Easily Achieves High Overclocks, Excellent OC Performance Scaling, Easily Tweaked With AOD For Maximum Performan
Performance In Single Threaded Apps Not On Par With Multithreaded, Gold, Discuss this review in our forums
It’s been a long wait for Bulldozer’s arrival, with the date being pushed back again and again. Naturally, that had me going in looking for the flaw that kept it from coming to market on any of the previous announced release dates. Was the architectur...
Var detta test till hjälp?
Utmärkelse
-
Publicerad: 2011-10-12, Författare: Nick , testad av: icrontic.com
Bulldozer is the culmination of five years of effort and considerable heartache for AMD. They had a solid lead on Intel with the Athlon 64, but steadily lost momentum to Intel’s aggressive Tick Tock strategy over the ensuing half decade. AMD seemed to...
In many cases, AMD's FX-8150 is able to close the gap between the Phenom II X6 and Intel's Core i5 2500K. Given the right workload, Bulldozer is actually able to hang with Intel's fastest Sandy Bridge parts. We finally have a high-end AMD CPU with power g...
Breaking down our benchmark results we find that the AMD FX-8150 offers huge performance improvements over the Phenom II range when testing with Excel 2010, while it matched the Core i5-2500K and Core i7 920 processors. Our custom WinRAR benchmark als...
Honestly, AMD's Bulldozer didn't turn out as impressive as it sounded. In many applications, it is barely better than the Phenom II X6 1100T, and in a few others it's actually worse. However, these applications either weren't highly multi-threaded, or ...
time Alrighty, time to give a small overview of the previous pages : The AMD FX-8150 CPU out of the box, is not really what many might have expected. Why ? As it is hardly any better in older apps then the previous AMD Thuban lineup. I explicitly ment...
So, let’s say someone puts Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 in front of you. The Core i5 costs $220 bucks, and the FX runs $245. Which one do you buy? If it’s me, I’m going with the Core i5. I gave the -2500K a Tom’s Hardware Recommended Buy award back in Jan...
Publicerad: 2011-10-12, Författare: James , testad av: pureoverclock.com
AMD has been buzzing along as of late with the release of Zacate and Llano. The new direction of the company has really been a breath of fresh air especially with the introduction of “Fusion” technology. The on-die GPU’s that support DX11 are simply gr...
