Testseek.se har samlat 272 tester av Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155 och det genomsnittliga betyget är 87%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155.
Januari 2011
(87%)
272 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
(97%)
1781 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
870100272
Testarna gillade
Extrem flertrådad prestanda
Upplåst överklockning
Modern plattform
Goda anslutningsmöjligheter
Marknadsledande prestanda
Extremt fin överklockningspotential på luft
Låg energiförbrukning
Relativt kraftfull integrerad grafikdel
Testarna gillade inte
Tappar prestanda vid dåligt trådade scenarion
Något sämre energieffektivitet än storebror
Dyr plattform
Kräver sannolikt ny processorkylare
Extrem LN2överklockning begränsas av 57x multiplier
Vi fik OC testet Intels 2600K, og det er tid til at uddele karakterer. Den får topkarakter hos mig, Jeg er ret imponeret over ydelsen på den, Den overclocker helt vildt godt, selv på luft. Den knuser tal hurtigere end noget jeg har oplevet før. ...
Var detta test till hjälp?
Utmärkelse
(93%)
Publicerad: 2021-10-12, Författare: Steven , testad av: techspot.com
All the data we've gathered provides real insight into how AMD and Intel CPU architectures compared over the past decade for gaming. We've seen AMD come from nowhere to often beating Intel, while the latter has made smaller steps in pure architecture term...
Publicerad: 2019-05-16, Författare: Ian , testad av: anandtech.com
Sammanfattning: One of the most popular processors of the last decade has been the Intel Core i7-2600K. The design was revolutionary, as it offered a significant jump in single core performance, efficiency, and the top line processor was very overclockable. With the next...
Publicerad: 2019-05-16, Författare: Ian , testad av: anandtech.com
Sammanfattning: One of the most popular processors of the last decade has been the Intel Core i7-2600K. The design was revolutionary, as it offered a significant jump in single core performance, efficiency, and the top line processor was very overclockable. With the next...
Publicerad: 2018-12-03, Författare: Steve , testad av: gamersnexus.net
Yes, it's still good – just the extent of its usefulness will depend on your use cases, as always. First of all, for anyone with an i7-2600K and trying to stretch it a bit longer, we can strongly recommend considering an overclock attempt. It's not too di...
This funny little review derived out of the fact that many of you guys in the forums often debate CPU bottlenecks, and refer to the fact that you are still playing games on a dated PC, like the one shown today. Back in the days, the Core i7 2600K was a ho...
The performance gains seen here are reminiscent of those seen when Intel launched its core2 architecture with the core2 duo series of processors. The 2nd generation of core processors does things faster, while guzzling less energy. They run cooler and ove...
Publicerad: 2015-08-06, Författare: Ian , testad av: anandtech.com
Since then, despite the perseverance of (or soon to be mildly delayed) Moore's Law, performance is measured differently. Efficiency, core count, integrated SIMD graphics, heterogeneous system architecture and specific instruction sets are now used due to...
You may wonder why it took us so long to review the FX-8150? We received the processor last month and had to cover the Haswell Core i7-4770K first along with Computex 2013 which had put alot of load on me. But here we finally have the Bulldozer review and...
Sammanfattning: Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...
