Testseek.se har samlat 159 tester av OCZ 2.5 inch Vector 150 Series SATA600 och det genomsnittliga betyget är 83%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för OCZ 2.5 inch Vector 150 Series SATA600.
December 2013
(83%)
159 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Solid performance, Better steady state performance than old Vector, Good MySQL enterprise 48 threads results, Acronis drive migration software included, 7.5 mm thin—Ultrabook compatible, Supports TRIM, 5-year warranty
More expensive than comparable drives, Not as fast as other high-end drives (which are more expensive, though)
The OCZ Vector 150 240 GB will, according to OCZ, cost $240. Solid performance Better steady state performance than old Vector Good MySQL enterprise 48 threads results Acronis drive migration software included 7.5 mm thin—Ultrabook compatible Supports TRI...
Outstanding 559/534 MBps read/write speed with ATTO, Random 4K read/writes produced 88,299 IOPS – best tested!, Indilinx Barefoot 3 processor offers native TRIM support, Automatic AES256 data encryption, 5Year OCZ product warranty support, Offered in 120/
Expensive enthusiastlevel product
Our first rating is Performance, which compares how effective the OCZ Vector 150 SSD performs in operations against competing SATA-based solid state drive storage solutions. For reference, OCZ Technology specifies the Indilinx Barefoot 3 BF3-M00 control...
As expected with the Barefoot 3 controller, the OCZ Vector 150 has great performance, however, we found power consumption ratings a bit under the weather....
Publicerad: 2013-11-07, Författare: Les , testad av: thessdreview.com
The OCZ Vector features excellent performance, a five year warranty, solid build and accessories, as well as unexpected sustained performance not common in consumer SSDs....
Publicerad: 2013-11-07, Författare: Steven , testad av: techspot.com
Added 256bit AES hardware encryption improves security while 19nm MLC synchronous memory promises 150% more writes than 2012's original 25nmbased Vector.
The Vector 150's performance is largely on par with last year's drive, which wouldn't be an issue on its own, but it becomes one with OCZ's asking price of $1.00/GB or more.
Performance-wise, little has changed about OCZ's Vector series over the last year. The new Vector 150 is generally slightly faster than the original, but it can be slower -- much slower in some cases. Meanwhile, despite boasting a higher sequential write...
Samsung's 850 Pro SSDs are without a doubt the fastest SSDs of this moment. Given that this product does not seem to have any flaws, we heartily recommend it to those who are looking for the fastest possible SSD. The Vector 150 and AMD Radeon R7 SSDs ar...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2014-06-01, Författare: Andrew , testad av: techadvisor.co.uk
The OCZ Vector 150 is a solid-feeling and impressively performing SSD. It compares well with Intel's latest performance drive, yet is closer to 50p per gigabyte rather than 75p. At that price, it deserves a strong recommendation.Tags:StorageBest prices to...
Publicerad: 2014-05-12, Författare: Andrew , testad av: macworld.co.uk
Good price
512 GBclass drive has 480 GB available
The fruits of Toshiba MLC NAND flash and the union of OCZ and Indilinx's controller designers have created a solid-feeling and performing performance SSD. It compares well with Intel's latest performance drive, yet is closer to 50p per gigabyte rather tha...
Sammanfattning: Last month we published a review on Intels new 730 series SSD , based on the same controller that you can find in Intel enterprise SSDs. As the controller is developed in house by Intel they claim that the consistency in the performance of these drives ...
Great Durability, High Performance, Included Software & Accessories
Heavy (for notebook users), Expensive in comparison
The OCZ Vector 150 is the logical step up in performance from the Vector 450. We already knew the vector 450 was a great performer as per our review here and while the Vector 150 succeeded in bettering this drive in a lot of tests we were not exactly ...
