Testseek.se har samlat 144 tester av Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 och det genomsnittliga betyget är 81%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1.
December 2011
(81%)
144 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
(87%)
30 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
810100144
Testarna gillade
Bra bildkvalitet
Grepp och hantering. Lätt och smidig. Gediget byggd.
Expensive, image quality won't quite beat a DSLR, power zoom too slow
Premium build and a fault-free layout make the GX1 effortless to use. It’s perfect for more demanding users that want to crack on and take pictures. The only criticisms are the new power zoom lens is slow and the image quality, while decent, won’t outs...
Sturdy metal body, Customisable interface, loads of controls and settings, Very good picture quality (sharpness and noise control up to 1600 ISO), Full HD video with stereo sound, Compact zoom lens with electronic controls (good for smooth videos)
Noisy shutter, No manual video modes or mic socket, Electronic zoom controls (slight lag when changing focal length)
The Panasonic Lumix GX1 is an excellent successor to the GF1, bringing a host of great new features from Panasonic's bulkier cameras (G3) and consumer models alike (GF3). This pleasant and effective hybrid compact is ideal for anyone looking for fast a...
Flexible, configurable hardware; Small lens system courtesy of Micro Four Thirds system; Good low-light performance
None
A highly configurable camera that will appeal directly to the more ambitious photographer. Excellent low-light performance, accurate colour reproduction and sharp, noise-free results at even fairly middling sensitivity mean you'll have trouble finding ...
Great build quality, Good range of customisable features, Effective Creative Controls, Fast AF system, Decent image quality and overall low light performance
Touchscreen could be more responsive, Several of the controls may prove fiddly for some, No built-in viewfinder, LCD is fixed rather than articulated
ForGreat build qualityGood range of customisable featuresEffective Creative ControlsFast AF systemDecent image quality and overall low light performance...
Small yet richly featured, Excellent image quality, Good low-light performance, Built-in flash and hotshoe connector
Lumix 'X' powered zoom can be a bit fiddly
Overall image quality is fantastic and certainly on a par with the G3, with the GX1 being able to produce images full of bright, vibrant colours, pleasing tonality and contrast, sharp edges and good levels of detail. Given that the two cameras share the s...
Sammanfattning: If you've been following the development of the compact system cameras (CSCs), you'll remember that right at the beginning there was a fair amount of confusion about exactly who was the target audience. The basic idea seemed to be that the potential buyer...
Screen could be better; no in-body image stabilisation, $1199 (14-42mm lens); $1599 (12-35mm lens)
A beautiful camera that delivers on many of the promises the Compact System Camera category offers. With a better screen and improved UI design, it would be tough to beat.Related Tags: camera, compact, DMC-GX1, macworld, macworld australia, panasonic,...
Sammanfattning: Panasonic's DMC-GX1 arrived the day after I'd watched a doco on mid-20th century street photographers. Do you reckon I wanted to hit the street with a compact, unobtrusive camera that could handle an unpredictable range of subjects, or what?Picking the GX...
Relatively compact, Lots of features, Good image quality and performance, Excellent high ISO performance
Power Zoom lens isn't comfortable to use, No built-in EVF
The LUMIX GX1 incorporates manual features, a touchscreen and a high level of performance in a camera body that is compact and comfortable to hold. It produced excellent results in our tests, in the ISO testing in particular, and it's a good all-round cam...
This is a superb camera. Its only competition is the Olympus E-P3. The Olympus has a 12-megapixel sensor but in side-by-side pixel peeping we could not see any significant difference in output. As they cost about the same, the choice might come down to a...
