Publicerad: 2014-05-26, Författare: Chris , testad av: engadget.com
Runs an almost untouched version of Android 4.4.2, The vivid screen is a pleasant surprise, Rounded design makes for comfy gripping, Incredibly affordable
Only 4GB of internal storage, Rear camera is mediocre at best, No flash or front-facing camera
There's no two ways about it -- the Moto E is exciting, if not in the way most mobile buffs would like. You really shouldn't underestimate the sort of world-shaking power that can come from making something that's both very good and very cheap. So what if...
One of the lowest prices for any smartphone, period, Sturdy construction, Good sharpness for a screen of its size, Front facing speaker, Expandable Storage
Low resolution screen won't please screen nuts, Low tier performance package doesn't back the 1 GB of RAM, microSD card required in order to install a lot of apps, Simply not made to be anything more than a communication device, Camera lacks flash, and is
7.0 The Moto E is priced at just $129, unlocked, making it one of the cheapest smartphones you can get your hands on. The closest competitor is another Motorola device itself, the Moto G, which is priced $50 higher, but gets you a better display, a faster...
Solid, sturdy build and ergonomic design, Waterrepellant nanocoating and Gorilla Glass 3 protection, Sharp, highres screen, Supports 3G on both slots, Android KitKat, Smooth performance, Good battery life
No front camera for video calls, Fixedfocus primary camera, Paltry internal storage
It takes a lot to stand out in the budget segment – choices are many but most of them compromise on build quality, core specs and screen resolutions, and run older versions of Android. The Moto E scores on all of these aspects, especially build and screen...
Publicerad: 2014-05-21, Författare: Andrew , testad av: cnet.com
The Moto E is cheap, comes with the latest Android KitKat software and has a screen and processor capable of tackling the essentials
Its camera and battery life don't impress and it isn't much less than the Moto G, which remains the best Android bargain around
The Motorola Moto E is unquestionably cheap and has a set of specs that makes it more than capable of handling your basic everyday tasks. Its price, however, isn't much lower than the Moto G, which has a better camera, more powerful processor, improved s...
Publicerad: 2014-05-20, Författare: Chris , testad av: recombu.com
Incredible performance, Colourful screen, Sturdy, smart design, Good battery life
Camera is a weak point, Moto G is almost as cheap
Right, it's time to be annoyingly contradictory.Do we love the Motorola Moto E? Yes, we do. It's a great performer for the price, with a colourful screen, fun design, and plenty of great features that make it easy to set up and use.Would we recommend it...
Var detta test till hjälp?
(80%)
Publicerad: 2014-05-20, Författare: Michael , testad av: Pocketnow.com
Value never before seen, Durable, waterresistant hardware, Outstanding reception with solid speaker performance in all audio modes, Good endurance
Slow, very inconsistent software, Bad camera, MicroSD requirement impacts affordability
Between the software stumbles, the storage shortage, and the camera, you might think the Moto E a pretty wimpy contender. Frankly, we're not confident that it'll age well; consistent updates aside, smartphones usually slow down over time, and performance...
Sammanfattning: The Moto E from Motorola is one of those devices that shouldn't exist, not because it sucks. But rather to the fact that someone has finally made a worth while budget Android smartphone; and its not gimped. The Moto E retails for $129 without a contract a...
Sammanfattning: Motorola stirred up the smartphone market last year with its Moto G handset, which launched at £135 and quickly became Motorola's best-selling phone ever. The Moto G has been a genuinely disruptive product — readers of handset reviews will be familiar wit...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2014-05-17, Författare: Andrew , testad av: arstechnica.com
battery life
CPU, GPU, Wi-Fi, and cellular performance is good enough for the price, but objectively mediocre, MicroSD support is an improvement over stock Android but inelegant compared to Windows Phone, Who knows what's going to happen to Motorola once the Lenovo sa
