Testseek.se har samlat 53 tester av AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus och det genomsnittliga betyget är 69%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(69%)
53 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
-
0 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
69010053
Testarna gillade
Godkänd prestanda i prisklassen
Trivs med många trådar
Rejält utrymme för överklockning
Hårdvaruaccelererad AESkryptering
Testarna gillade inte
Svag prestanda vid färre trådar
Jämförelsevis hög energiförbrukning vid standardfrekvenser
Godkänd prestanda i prisklassen, Trivs med många trådar, Rejält utrymme för överklockning, Hårdvaruaccelererad AESkryptering
Svag prestanda vid färre trådar, Jämförelsevis hög energiförbrukning vid standardfrekvenser, Enormt hög energiförbrukning vid överklockning
När AMD Bulldozer lanserades under hösten 2011 fick processorfamiljen omgående ett skamfilat rykte. Sedan dess har dock en hel del vatten flutit under broarna, med både mjukvaruoptimeringar och prissänkningar i backspegeln. Det är förutsättningarna fö...
Endnu en FX-cpu, denne gang med 6 kerner og dermed endnu større forventninger end jeg havde til FX-4100. AMD havde hypet Bulldozer-arkitekturen til at være den arkitektur der skulle vælte Intel med et brag. Men som man måske har læst i andre tests, ...
Sammanfattning: We've already reviewed the top processor of AMD's Vishera family, FX-8350. That was just the beginning of the big refresh for the Socket AM3+ platform. AMD has also rolled out a number of more affordable CPUs. Today we're going to cover them in compari...
Sammanfattning: Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...
Sammanfattning: This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...
Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...
New processor architectures don’t come round all that often and there was a great deal of excitement in anticipation of Bulldozer. Breaking with the traditional vision of cores, its CMT architecture was indeed promising on paper but its integration wit...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2011-11-07, Författare: Carl , testad av: HardCOREware.net
Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...
Sammanfattning: AMD FX 8150 - 8120 - 6100 and 4100 performance reviewYesterday AMD released the FX series Zambezi - Bulldozer based processor. Everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8150 processor. However there where three other processors released.Thi...
Sammanfattning: On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...
