Testseek.se har samlat 54 tester av AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3 Plus och det genomsnittliga betyget är 82%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3 Plus.
(82%)
54 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Bra prestanda i flertrådade program, Tillgänglighet, Priset,
Dålig prestanda i singeltrådade program, Strömförbrukning (särskilt om man överklockar)
FX-8120, liksom Bulldozer-plattformen i sin helhet, är lite av en konstig produkt på marknaden. Även om det är mediokert resultat i flertrådade program, faller den långt bakom Intel-processorer i samma prisklass i singeltrådade program. Intel i5 2500K...
AMD FX-8120 med sine åtte prosessorkjerner og basefrekvens på 3,1 GHz, med turbofrekvenser opp til 4 GHz, ser på papiret ut som en skikkelig kraftplugg. Med en prislapp på en drøy tusenlapp, kan FX-8120 virke som et kjempekjøp om du er på jakt etter e...
Publicerad: 2013-02-11, Författare: Don , testad av: tomshardware.com
Sammanfattning: Now that Piledriver-based CPUs and APUs are widely available (and the FX-8350 is selling for less than $200), it's a great time to compare value-oriented chips in our favorite titles. We're also breaking out a test that conveys the latency between frames....
Sammanfattning: Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...
Sammanfattning: Not long after the launch of Bulldozer, AMD have filled their ranks with an entire gamma of CPUs based on this microarchitecture, with the prefix FX, which is a marketing trick supposed to remind us of the “good old times” when FX CPUs were the alpha a...
Sadly, its more of the same bad news for AMD or anyone with a Socket AM3+ motherboard looking for a decent CPU for around the £150 mark. The FX-8120 just isn't a good choice when it comes to the kind of applications we run on our PCs. It's regularly outpa...
The CPU presentation box is very special, much more interesting than the solution chosen by Intel; the included CPU cooler is pretty loud and we recommend acquiring a custom cooling solution right from the start. By using a high-end air CPU cooler, ...
Good performance in multithread programs, Availability, Price
Bad performance in single thread, Power consumption (especially if overclocked)
FX-8120, like the Bulldozer platform in whole, is bit of a weird product on the market. While it has mediocre performance in multithreaded programs, it falls far behind similarly priced Intel processors in singlethreaded programs. Intel i5 2500K did b...
Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2011-11-07, Författare: Carl , testad av: HardCOREware.net
Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...
