Testseek.se har samlat 14 tester av Intel Xeon W-3175X 3.1GHz Socket 3647 och det genomsnittliga betyget är 82%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för Intel Xeon W-3175X 3.1GHz Socket 3647.
(82%)
14 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
(92%)
27 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
82010014
Tester
sidan 1 av 2
Sortera på:
Betyg
Publicerad: 2019-01-30, Författare: Marco , testad av: hothardware.com
Killer Multi-Threaded Performance, Mature, Server-Class Platform, Better IPC / Single-Thread Than AMD, Monolithic Design And Memory Config, Fully Unlocked
Expensive CPU, Expensive Platform, High Power Consumption, Will Require Powerful Cooling And Top-End PSU When Overclocking, Limited Motherboard Selection, Uncommon Form Factor And Case Selection
Raw performance isn't the only consideration with a processor and platform like this, however. Pricing and the overall user experience also matter, and in these categories AMD's many-core workstation processors may be more appealing to most of you. The Xe...
Publicerad: 2019-01-30, Författare: Paul , testad av: tomshardware.com
High performance in lightly-threaded applications, High performance in multi-threaded applications, Unlocked multiplier makes overclocking easier,
Expensive motherboard is required, Sky-high power consumption, High price-per-core hurts value proposition
Predictable results are a must in professional workloads, and the W-3175X delivers with a superior blend of performance in both lightly- and heavily-threaded applications. As with most of Intel's high-end processors, you pay a hefty premium for the privil...
The Intel Xeon W-3175X processor is a beast and it should be as this is the new flagship desktop workstation processor from Intel. At $2,999 for just the processor and availability only from System Integrators, this platform is really aimed at professiona...
Publicerad: 2019-01-30, Författare: Steve , testad av: gamersnexus.net
As stated earlier, this part is sort of hard to review from our normal vantage point. It's not really available for consumers – at least, not yet – and is starting life as a system integrator part. The Dominus motherboard doesn't even have an official p...
Publicerad: 2019-01-30, Författare: Ian , testad av: anandtech.com
When you buy a system, ask yourself – what matters most to you?Is it gaming performance?Is it bang-for-buck?Is it all-out peak performance?Is it power consumption?Is it performance per watt?I can guarantee that out of the AnandTech audience, we will have...
If you are going to buy this system from an SI, which is the main buying option, then you will get performance similar to what you see in the charts compared to if you went to a store and bought the other parts. The CPU is more than a CPU, it's pretty muc...
Publicerad: 2019-04-18, Författare: Andreas , testad av: hardwareluxx.de
In vielen Belangen können wir das wiederholen, was wir bereits beim Vergleich des Core i7-9700K gegen den Core i9-9980XE gesagt bzw. niedergeschrieben haben. Es gilt sich sehr genau anzuschauen, für welchen Verwendungszweck eine bestimmte Hardware-Kompone...
Sammanfattning: Esta bestia, llamada Intel Xeon W-3175X tiene nada menos que 28 cores, con una frecuencia base de 3.1 GHz y 4.3 GHz en modo turbo, con un TDP de nada menos que 255W, “unlocked” para overclocking y soporta memora ECC en sus 6 canales DDR4-2666 MHz.Este nue...
Publicerad: 2019-02-01, Författare: vai , testad av: tomshw.it
Sammanfattning: Pagina 1: Intel Xeon W-3175X recensione: processore con 28 core e 56 thread a carissimo prezzo Pagina 1: Intel Xeon W-3175X recensione: processore con 28 core e 56 thread a carissimo prezzo Pagina 2: Asus ROG Dominus Extreme e sistema di prova...
Publicerad: 2019-04-20, Författare: Андрей , testad av: hardwareluxx.ru
Sammanfattning: Мы сравнили три процессора AMD и Intel с самым большим числом ядер, в случае Intel число ядер зависит от платформы. Процессор Core i9-9980XE предлагает 18 ядер и 36 потоков. 18 ядер работают на базовой частоте 3,0 ГГц, в режиме Boost она может увеличивать...
