Testseek.se har samlat 105 tester av OCZ 2.5 inch Radeon R7 Series SATA600 och det genomsnittliga betyget är 82%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för OCZ 2.5 inch Radeon R7 Series SATA600.
(82%)
105 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
(92%)
104 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
820100105
Tester
sidan 1 av 11
Sortera på:
Betyg
Publicerad: 2014-08-19, Författare: Gustav , testad av: nordichardware.se
AMD:s första SSD-enhet är en enhet som tillverkas och supporteras av OCZ. Enheten bygger på deras Barefoot 3 kontroller och det handlar då om den snabbare varianten som vi tidigare testat i OCZ:s Vector 150. Detta är dock inte en klassisk produktommärknin...
Publicerad: 2014-12-10, Författare: John , testad av: elektroniktest.dk
Ydelsen i vedvarende belastning: Som det kan ses i testen, så klarer den sig rigtig godt under belastning. Vi har belastet den 12 timer i træk, hvor vi så har taget gennemsnittet, af de 144 tests der er kørt i de 12 timer, og resultet er ganske godt. OCZ
Jeg ser ingen negative ting: At sige om dette produkt.
AMD Radeon R7 SSD'en er lidt mere end blot en re-branded OCZ ARC 100. Indmaden er næsten den samme, men R7 har fået en opgraderet Barefoot 3 controller der løfter ydelsen, og vi bliver lovet et højere dagligt dataforbrug uden at ydelsen går ned. Flashra...
Sammanfattning: Selvom AMD ikke kræver nogen større introduktion, så markerer dagens emne alligevel nyt territorium for hold rød. Med over 30 år i branchen er det i år første gang vi ser en harddisk fra dem, og i tråd med virksomhedens profil er det ikke hvilken som hels...
Var detta test till hjälp?
(80%)
Publicerad: 2019-02-07, Författare: Jeff , testad av: Techreport.com
Let's sum up the hundreds of graphs on the preceding pages with our famous value scatter plots. To create these charts, we take the geometric mean of both average frame rates and 99th-percentile frame times across all of our tests, then convert that 99th...
Excellent 4K/60 gaming, Beautiful design, 16GB of high-bandwidth memory, Greatly improved power efficiency and thermals
Comparable performance to 2-year-old GTX 1080 Ti, No dedicated ray tracing hardware
AMD's Radeon VII is a fast, memory-rich graphics card loaded down with the latest technologies. It trades blows with Nvidia's GeForce RTX 2080 in 4K gaming...
Trails RTX 2080 Overall, Fan Noise Under Load, Overclocking Tools Didn't Work Well
In the graphics and game tests, the story isn't so clear. Our VR-related benchmarks showed the Radeon VII trailing the lower-priced GeForce RTX 2070. The Radeon VII also trailed the RTX 2070 in the DX12 3DMark Time Spy benchmark, though the Radeon jumped...
First 7 nanometer GPU in the world, 16 GB HBM2 memory, Solid performance increase over RX Vega 64, Power efficiency improved, Better overclocking potential than earlier Vega cards, Additional temperature sensors, Backplate included, Three AAA game bundle
Average performance not even close to RTX 2080, Pricing seems high when compared to RTX 2080, Very noisy cooler in gaming, No idle fan stop, but very quiet in idle, Power efficiency still far worse than NVIDIA's, No support for DirectX Raytracing
AMD's Radeon VII will be available starting today, from all major board vendors, for $699. First 7 nanometer GPU in the world 16 GB HBM2 memory Solid performance increase over RX Vega 64 Power efficiency improved Better overclocking potential than earlier...
Publicerad: 2019-02-07, Författare: Steven , testad av: techspot.com
Faster Radeon graphics, yay! AMD fans get a faster GPU but you're going to have to pay for it and it's not better than the competition. Massive 16GB frame buffer and insane 1TB/s memory bandwidth must be good for something
Radeon VII runs hot and loud. Value is worse than RTX cards, and you don't even get the benefit of the doubt of DLSS or ray tracing for the extra money. Drivers are unstable at launch, which could mean more performance down the line. If not, AMD will ha
We're not even going to try and sugar coat it -- not that we ever do -- I guess I'm just getting over disappointing GPU releases. Looking at cost per frame data, naturally it's worse value than the RTX 2080 and despite being faster than Vega 56 and 64, it...
