Testseek.se har samlat 15 tester av Xerox Phaser 6500 Series och det genomsnittliga betyget är 75%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för Xerox Phaser 6500 Series.
(75%)
15 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Publicerad: 2014-03-25, Författare: M. , testad av: pcmag.com
Fast. Excellent paper handling for a small office or workgroup.
Although output quality is good across the board, text is at the low end of the range where the majority of color lasers fall
The Xerox Phaser 6500/DN color laser printer offers a highly attractive balance of speed, output quality, and paper handling for a small office or workgroup....
The Xerox Phaser 6500DN is equipped for busy workgroup use. Unfortunately, its color costs make higher-volume usage prohibitively expensive. See more like this: printer color, printer laser, printer laser, printer workgroup, business, ...
The Phaser 6500N is an ideal fit for both an office and home use, despite its basic feature set....
Var detta test till hjälp?
(75%)
Publicerad: 2012-03-18, Författare: Simon , testad av: trustedreviews.com
PostScript Level 3 as standard, Reasonably quick print for price, Easy access toner cartridges
Paper tray bulge at back, Slightly above average running costs, Quite tall for desktop positioning
Xerox claims speeds of 23ppm for both black and colour print from the Phaser 6500V/DN. Our 5-page black text test returned 11.1ppm, less than half the claim, but this rose to 18.5ppm on a 20-page document. The 5-page black text and colour graphics test ga...
Excellent results with colour printouts, Produces crisp and clean black and white documents, Low price tag, Good print speed
Print costs are fairly high
For a sub-£200 colour laser printer, the speedy Phaser 6500 produces very high quality output on both black and white and colour documents. However, its high running costs mean it's not a great option for busier offices....
Var detta test till hjälp?
(80%)
Publicerad: 2011-10-04, Författare: Dave , testad av: alphr.com
A compact A4 colour laser with superb output quality, but its running costs are unacceptably high...
