The Oakley 3D Gascan are undeniably expensive, but very comfortable and should work with any device that needs passive polarized 3D glasses. What Others Say about This Sony's Corey Turner Talks "Arthur Christmas" & "Men In Black III" - Part 2 of In...
Var detta test till hjälp?
Utmärkelse
(95%)
Publicerad: 2011-09-19, Författare: Mat , testad av: gizmodo.com
Color and light looked better in these glasses than the hand-out pair the theater gave me. The screen didn't look quite so muddy. Still images popped more. Even when I looked through the corners of the glasses, next to the frame, the image looked great. T
Oakley promises a lot with these, but to be honest I had a hard time telling enough of a difference between the 3D Gascan and the garden variety handouts to justify the price. In the area it matters most, crosstalk, I couldn't really tell much of a differ
Maybe. But probably not. Look, theyre very nice. The optics are better than the movie theater glasses and theyre damn near indestructible. But $120, is a lot of coin to drop for a marginal performance improvement. How many 3D movies do you see a year? I...
Stylish design, Excellent image quality, Curved lens creates more immersive field of view
Expensive, Cannot be used as sunglasses
If a passive 3D TV has recently made its way into your home or that of a friend or relative, Oakley's HDO 3D passive 3D glasses will help you to make the most of your 3D viewing experience. They are expensive but do provide a noticeable, if sometimes ...
Eyewear is a subjective topic, and your own personal enjoyment and interest in 3D should also be considered when judging whether or not the Oakley 3D Gascan glasses are worth their .If you enjoy the 3D effect at the cinema and have a passive 3D system ...
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis: GutOakleys GASCAN-3D-Brille bringt neuen Style ins Kino und sorgt für etwas mehr Abwechslung unter den meist zu großen Polfilterbrillen, die von etlichen Kinos verteilt werden. Durch optisch korrekte Gläser und ein stabiles ...
