Testseek.se har samlat 29 tester av Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200–500mm f/5.6E ED VR och det genomsnittliga betyget är 81%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200–500mm f/5.6E ED VR.
Januari 2016
(81%)
29 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Vill du nå längre så är nya supertele-zoomen ett spännande och prisvärt alternativ. Med en genomgående bländare på 5,6 är det inte det ljusstarkaste objektivet i brännvidden, men å andra sidan blir det ett intressant alternativ för den som vill resa lätta...
Sammanfattning: Nikons nya 200–500 mm blir en klassiker. Det är ett mekaniskt oklanderligt objektiv med en effektiv 4,5-stegs bildstabilisering och bländare F5.6 rakt igenom, vilket gör det lättare att fota manuellt. Objektivet är vädertätat och ett nöje att...
Sammanfattning: Toplækker nyklassikerNikons nye 200-500mm bliver en klassiker. Det er et mekanisk ulasteligt objektiv med effektiv 4,5-trins billedstabilisering, og fuld blænde er F5.6 over hele zoomområdet, hvilket gør det nemmere at optage manuelt. Objektivet er tætnet...
Impressive image quality, Good autofocus and stabilization, Useful focal range
Not fully weather sealed, Rival lenses have greater focal range
If you're after an own-brand super-tele zoom for your Nikon DSLR, the Nikon AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR is a high-performing lens which is, at least by Nikon's standards, reasonably priced for the focal range on offer. It's a little disappointing that the...
Publicerad: 2018-10-30, Författare: Maciej , testad av: lenstip.com
excellent image quality in the frame centre, good image quality on the edge of the APSC/DX sensor, sensible image quality on the edge of full frame in the 200–350 mm range, slight lateral chromatic aberration, moderate distortion, perfect coma correction,
problems with performance against bright light, The NikkorAFS 200–500 mm f/5.6E ED VR is a very good answer of that renowned producer to lenses of similar class which have been offered by independent producers for many years. The Nikkor is an instrument d
The tested Nikkor 200-500 mm is so good and its list of pros so long that for a moment I even toyed with an idea to award it our ‘Editor's Choice' badge. I dropped that thought because there are too many small flaws, too negligible to be listed in the con...
Sammanfattning: With a long zoom range at a tempting price, Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR lens could be outstanding. Phil Hall tries it out on a wildlife photography tripDespite advances in camera resolution that offer the option to crop images more aggressi...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2016-05-26, Författare: Jim , testad av: pcmag.com
Sharp optics, Long telephoto reach, Fixed f/5,6 maximum aperture, Optical stabilization, Includes removable tripod collar
Competing lenses zoom further, Edges soft at 200mm, Not compatible with some older D-SLRs
The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR is a long telezoom lens that nets sharp results, but there are better values available...
Sammanfattning: Big, butch and surprisingly affordable, this lens puts the ‘super' into super-telephoto. Get our verdict as we put the Nikon AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR through its paces.Current Nikon super-telephoto zooms run up to the 400mm mark, like the 80-400mm VR a...
Lens Review: Nikon AFS NIKKOR 200500mm F/5.6E ED VR, APRIL 07, 2016, By Greg Scoblete, For Nikon full frame (FX format) shooters, getting a 500mm focal length in the NIKKOR lens family without a teleconverter has entailed parting with some serious cash, m
Lens Review: Nikon AFS NIKKOR 200500mm F/5.6E ED VR
For Nikon shooters in need of a long reach, there are a few other lenses to consider outside of the 200-500mm, including the aforementioned Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary and Tamron's SP 150-600mm. While both of those third-party lenses have variable apertu...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2016-03-21, Författare: Stan , testad av: shutterbug.com
My impression is that the Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR lens has very little distortion and not much falloff. The only tease I got was when I zoomed out to 500mm shooting at a nondescript background; there was some indication in the corners, even when var...
