Testseek.se har samlat 266 tester av AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus och det genomsnittliga betyget är 79%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Juli 2015
(79%)
266 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
(93%)
2719 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
790100266
Testarna gillade
Billig
Strömsnål
Bra flertårdsprestanda
Extrem flertrådad prestanda
Upplåst överklockning
Modern plattform
Goda anslutningsmöjligheter
Bra prestanda med de flesta applikationer som använder flera trådar
Olåst multipel
Godkända överklockningsresultat
Bra relation mellan pris/prestanda (prisvärd)
Förhållandevis god prestanda i tungt flertrådade applikationer
Upplåst multiplier för överklockning
Goda överklockningsmarginaler
Aggressiv prissättning
Förhållandevis bra prestanda i flertrådsapplikationer. Lätt att överklocka. Priset
Testarna gillade inte
Flyttalsprestandan
Begränsad L3-cache
Låg OC-potential
Tappar prestanda vid dåligt trådade scenarion
Något sämre energieffektivitet än storebror
Dyr plattform
Kräver sannolikt ny processorkylare
Prestandan med en processorkärna är mindre bra
Spelprestandan kunde ha varit bättre
Hög strömförbrukning
Enkeltrådad prestanda ligger långt efter Intel
Fortfarande hög strömförbrukning
Enkeltrådad prestanda och strömeffektivitet långt efter Intel
So, what have we learned? Objectively, when looking at our entire benchmarking and gaming suite, the FX-8350 is priced right where it should be. Let's start with a reminder of price. As configured, the two systems here are $220 apart, or 16.7%. As menti...
Does, the AMD FX-8350, flagship of the new AMD FX range, mark AMD’s return to form? There has been much progress since the launch of the FX-8150, though it has to be said that this isn’t saying all that much. In terms of performance first of all, there...
Sammanfattning: We take a look at the Trinity based A10-5800K and Vishera FX-8350 processors from AMD and see how they do in terms of all important performance....
The FX-8350 is faster across the board than the FX-8150 but like its predecessor, it's hampered by uninspiring single-threaded performance and crummy energy efficiency. In both regards, there's a lot of ground to make up if AMD want to catch Intel. Sa...
AMD has done a lot to improve the FX-8350 considering the lack of usual CPU architecture improvements. With no change in die size, TDP or production process, its managed to squeeze up to 15 per cent more performance out of this chip, all whilst lowering p...
Sammanfattning: The AMD FX-8350 has a slight performance-per-Watt advantage over the FX-8150 when running OpenSSL. Through a wide variety of benchmarks, the average system power consumption for the AMD FX-8350 in the system with the ASUS Crosshair V Formula mother...
Sammanfattning: AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 processors performance analyzedAMD released the FX series Vishera - Piledriver based processor. And though everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8350 processor, another three processors have been relea...
Sammanfattning: Last year's launch of AMD's FX processors was honestly disappointing. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn't significantly outperform AMD's previous generation platform. Look...
Sammanfattning: Bulldozer is the word. Ok, perhaps it is not “the” word, but it is “a” word. When AMD let that little codename slip some years back, AMD enthusiasts and tech journalists started to salivate about the possibilities. Here was a unique and very new...
