Testseek.se har samlat 266 tester av AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus och det genomsnittliga betyget är 79%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Juli 2015
(79%)
266 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
(93%)
2719 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
790100266
Testarna gillade
Billig
Strömsnål
Bra flertårdsprestanda
Extrem flertrådad prestanda
Upplåst överklockning
Modern plattform
Goda anslutningsmöjligheter
Bra prestanda med de flesta applikationer som använder flera trådar
Olåst multipel
Godkända överklockningsresultat
Bra relation mellan pris/prestanda (prisvärd)
Förhållandevis god prestanda i tungt flertrådade applikationer
Upplåst multiplier för överklockning
Goda överklockningsmarginaler
Aggressiv prissättning
Förhållandevis bra prestanda i flertrådsapplikationer. Lätt att överklocka. Priset
Testarna gillade inte
Flyttalsprestandan
Begränsad L3-cache
Låg OC-potential
Tappar prestanda vid dåligt trådade scenarion
Något sämre energieffektivitet än storebror
Dyr plattform
Kräver sannolikt ny processorkylare
Prestandan med en processorkärna är mindre bra
Spelprestandan kunde ha varit bättre
Hög strömförbrukning
Enkeltrådad prestanda ligger långt efter Intel
Fortfarande hög strömförbrukning
Enkeltrådad prestanda och strömeffektivitet långt efter Intel
Sammanfattning: Earlier this month we looked at the gaming performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7 , and it turns out there was no difference. Afterwards our loyal readers asked us to apply our expertise to the processor performance in Windows 8, to find out whe...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2012-11-08, Författare: Dave , testad av: techradar.com
Good stable overclock, Great multi, treaded performance, Good value for money
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer, Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP, Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks, Good performance for the money
High power consumption is still an issue, Single threaded performance still needs improvement, 32nm technology, Intel are on 22nm
AMD have certainly raised the game with the revised version of Bulldozer, known now as Piledriver. However, we have not seen the quoted 'up to 23%' improvement which AMD said there should be. Obviously, that is in an ideal world it may be that big of ...
Sammanfattning: The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...
Sammanfattning: It is just over a year since AMD launched its flagship consumer CPU. Probably known to you as 'Bulldozer' and brought to market under the performance-intimating FX branding, AMD's grounds-up design, comprised of up to eight cores, generally failed to win ...
Sammanfattning: Last year, AMD launched its Bulldozer architecture to disappointed enthusiasts who were hoping to see the company rise to its former glory. Today, we get an FX processor based on the Piledriver update. Does it give power users something to celebrate? A...
This year has primarily been about Intel with their success of Ivy Bridge and the Z77 platform, but we mustn't forget about AMD as they still take a chunk of the market that appeals to the budget conscious who want the very best performance, but can't aff...
Publicerad: 2012-10-23, Författare: Stuart , testad av: hardwareheaven.com
Just over a year on from the original FX launch where does the FX-8350 leave us? Well looking at the build quality first we have a chip which shares the same good level of manufacturing as previous CPUs. These are resilient chips and cope well with plenty...
AMD FX 8350 may not be the most powerful option on the market, or have the latest technology, but the raw performance is still ample for most gaming needs...
