Testseek.se har samlat 266 tester av AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus och det genomsnittliga betyget är 79%. Scrolla ned och se alla testerna för AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Juli 2015
(79%)
266 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av experter som har testat produkten.
Användare
(93%)
2719 Tester
Genomsnittligt betyg av ägare till produkten.
790100266
Testarna gillade
Billig
Strömsnål
Bra flertårdsprestanda
Extrem flertrådad prestanda
Upplåst överklockning
Modern plattform
Goda anslutningsmöjligheter
Bra prestanda med de flesta applikationer som använder flera trådar
Olåst multipel
Godkända överklockningsresultat
Bra relation mellan pris/prestanda (prisvärd)
Förhållandevis god prestanda i tungt flertrådade applikationer
Upplåst multiplier för överklockning
Goda överklockningsmarginaler
Aggressiv prissättning
Förhållandevis bra prestanda i flertrådsapplikationer. Lätt att överklocka. Priset
Testarna gillade inte
Flyttalsprestandan
Begränsad L3-cache
Låg OC-potential
Tappar prestanda vid dåligt trådade scenarion
Något sämre energieffektivitet än storebror
Dyr plattform
Kräver sannolikt ny processorkylare
Prestandan med en processorkärna är mindre bra
Spelprestandan kunde ha varit bättre
Hög strömförbrukning
Enkeltrådad prestanda ligger långt efter Intel
Fortfarande hög strömförbrukning
Enkeltrådad prestanda och strömeffektivitet långt efter Intel
Sammanfattning: Today, AMD is releasing its second-generation of FX CPUs, dubbed “Vishera.” The FX-8350 is currently the highest-end model available, running at 4 GHz and costing USD 195. Let’s see how it fares against its main competitor, the Core i5-3470 (3.2 GHz, U...
This is one of those occasions where AMD has done their job well, but we can’t really celebrate quite yet. The new flagship AMD FX-8350 “Vishera” definitively takes the title of champion amongst AMD processors. The Phenom II 1100T 6-core CPU can’t even...
Publicerad: 2012-10-22, Författare: Victor , testad av: Bjorn3d.com
Piledriver is what Bulldozer should have been in the first place. The FX-8350 puts AMD back on track, but not yet back in the game. If it were not for Intel's exceptional high IPC and performance per watts ratio on Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge, AMD's Vishera/P...
Publicerad: 2012-10-22, Författare: Scott , testad av: Techreport.com
You've probably gathered that the FX-8350 improves on its Bulldozer-based precursor pretty handily for a chip that's neither a die shrink nor an all-new architecture. The final verdict on the FX-8350 isn't terribly difficult to render, but it does have s...
While AMD is trying to make a value statement with its new FX-8350 (selling for $219 at time of publication), it simply will not be able to do so in the enthusiast arena. Perhaps, if we find that the $169 FX-8320 turns out to be a healthy overclocker, it...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2012-10-22, Författare: Dan , testad av: legitreviews.com
The AMD FX-8350 has a number of strong points that make it a great choice for your computer. If you're looking to upgrade from an older system you really can't beat the price to performance ratio offered with an eight core 4GHz processor processor fo...
Back then, a year ago, when we first met the desktop Zambezi processors, it already felt like AMD Bulldozer didn’t really end up in a good spot. We can’t say that AMD’s microarchitecture is flawed. On the contrary, it is very interesting and is capabl...
Var detta test till hjälp?
-
Publicerad: 2012-10-22, Författare: Chris , testad av: tomshardware.com
We ran her through the twisties. We did the drag racing. We measured her mileage. We even popped her hood to figure out what makes this little speedster tick. In every way, today's FX-8350 is better than the FX-8150 that preceded it. Faster. More efficien...
Excellent affordability versus computing power, Low platform price, NEW Piledriver CPU core design, Improved "Per Clock" performance, Compatible with existing AM3+ products
Same maximum TDP as previous products, Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm, Higher power consumption than Intel products, "Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some
What can I say? AMD has priced these new FX-8350 CPUs in such a way that there is no doubt: they make an attractive alternative to their Intel counterparts, and AMD seems focused on keeping that price difference no matter what. AMD can't take Intel ove...
Publicerad: 2017-03-14, Författare: Paul , testad av: tomshardware.co.uk
As we noted in the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X CPU Review, gaming is a mixed bag for AMD. Some titles respond well to the new architecture, while most others still require optimization of some sort. Where those optimizations will focus remains a question mark...
